Implementation
Activities
Letter from Superpave Team Leader
Dear Superpave
Colleague:
In 1996, the AASHTO
Task Force on SHRP Implementation created, among others, a "Lead
State Team" for Superpave Implementation. The mission of the Superpave
Team is to assist in the uniform implementation of the Superpave system
by documenting and sharing experiences, furthering development and providing
guidance related to the practical application of the technology.
Superpave was, of
course, the product of extensive research done under the SHRP Program.
Almost all research leaves some questions unanswered. These must ultimately
be resolved by additional research and/or practical real world experience.
In the case of Superpave, both are true.
n March of this
year, experts from the Superpave Lead States met together and with other
invited experts. This group examined information currently available
from completed and ongoing research. In addition, they considered their
collective experience in the practical application of the technology.
The result of their work is enclosed and is titled "1998 AASHTO
Superpave Lead State Guidance." As described in the introduction,
the new guidance incorporates and updates an original guidance document
similarly prepared in 1997.
Some of the guidance
recommends minor alteration of existing standards as adopted and published
by the MSHTO Subcommittee on Materials. Where the guidance does so,
it is noted with the document. The Lead States will propose revisions
to AASHTO Standards in accord with the guidance as written.
This leads to a
troublesome conflict within the mission of the Lead State Team. Since
Superpave is a system based on scientific research, the resulting standards
should not be altered without serious consideration by the AASHTO Subcommittee
on Materials and member states. Indeed, the Lead States have been advocates
for the uniform implementation by member states in accord with the adopted
standards. At the same time, our mission compels us to provide guidance
based on our collective experience in the practical application of the
Superpave System.
The guidance document
is an attempt to be true to both competing interests. As noted, we will
be recommending standard revisions with the expectation they will be
adopted. In the meantime, the guidance is what it says it is. It is
intended to ensure the success of Superpave implementation by providing
advice based on experience.
I would like to
extend my appreciation to those who contributed to the synthesis of
this document. They freely gave of their time and expertise so that
the success of our collective implementation might be enhanced. In addition,
I'd like to recognize Ronald Sines of New York, who contributed, edited,
coordinated reviews and synthesized the final document.
Sincerely,
Paul J. Mack, P.E.
Superpave Team Leader
Deputy Chief Engineer, NYSDOT
Director, Technical Services Division